EB-1C Dismissed — Party Planning (2006): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. The AAO also noted additional grounds for denial, including the failure to prove the beneficiary's employment abroad and proposed U.S. employment were in a managerial or executive capacity, and failure to establish the petitioner was doing business for one year prior to filing.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF