Dismissed
EB-1C
EB-1C Dismissed — Party Planning (2006): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the initial decision. The AAO also noted additional grounds for denial, including the petitioner's failure to establish it was doing business for at least one year prior to filing and its failure to prove its ability to pay the proffered wage.
Criteria Discussed
Employment Abroad In A Managerial Or Executive Capacity Employment In The United States In A Managerial Or Executive Capacity Petitioner Doing Business For One Year Prior To Filing Ability To Pay Proffered Wage Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact On Appeal
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more EB-1C decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →