dismissed EB-1C

dismissed EB-1C Case: Party Supply

📅 Date unknown 👤 Company 📂 Party Supply

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the Petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision, as required by regulation. Although the Petitioner stated a brief would be submitted, none was received.

Criteria Discussed

8 C.F.R. § 103.3(A)(1)(V) - Failure To Identify Specific Error On Appeal

View Full Decision Text

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF P-K-I- INC. 
APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: DEC. 26. 2017 
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner. a party supply business. seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as a ··chief 
executive officer" under the first preference immigrant classification of a multinational executive or 
manager. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b )( 1 )(C). 8 lJ .S.C. ~ 
1153(b )(1 )(C). The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition. The matter is nmv 
before us on appeal. Upon review. we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An ot1icer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. § 1 03.3(a)( 1 )(v). 
On appeaL the Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically 
identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the decision. On the Form I-2908. Notice of 
Appeal or Motion. the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 
30 days of filing. However. we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. 
Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of 
fact in the Director's decision below. the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ~ 1 03.3(a)( 1 )(v). 
Cite as Matter ofP-K-1- INC' .. ID# 852166 (AAO Dec. 26. 20 17)

Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.