EB-1C Dismissed — Retail, Services, And Investment (2009): the petitioner, through counsel, failed to specifically

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner, through counsel, failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original denial. Despite indicating an intent to file a brief or additional evidence, none was submitted, leading the AAO to conclude the appeal lacked a substantive basis.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF