EB-1C Dismissed — Tattoo Studio: did not establish the beneficiary was employed abroad in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary was employed abroad in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity, and that the proposed position in the U.S. would also be in a qualifying capacity. While the AAO withdrew the director's finding regarding the petitioner's ability to pay, it upheld the denial based on the lack of sufficient evidence defining the beneficiary's job duties as primarily managerial or executive.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF