dismissed EB-1C Case: Travel Services
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. The director found the initial evidence lacked specific details about the beneficiary's proposed duties. Despite the petitioner's argument that their internet-based business model requires less staff, the AAO agreed that the petitioner did not sufficiently prove the beneficiary's role would consist primarily of qualifying high-level duties rather than the day-to-day operational tasks of the company.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.
Start a Stronger Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.