dismissed EB-1C Case: Unknown

U.S. Department of Elomeland Security 
20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Multinational Executive or Manager Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(l)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 3 1153(b)(l)(C) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: SELF-REPRESENTED 
INSTRUCTIONS : 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
If you believe the law was inappropriately applied or you have additional information that you wish to have 
considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. Please refer to 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5 for 
the specific requirements. All motions must be submitted to the office that originally decided your case by 
filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $585. Any motion must be filed within 30 
days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider, as required by 8 C.F.R. 103.5(a)(l)(i). 
John F. Grissom, Acting Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. The 
matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be 
rejected as improperly filed. 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. $ 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(2)(i) states the following: 
If an appeal is filed by an attorney or representative without a properly executed 
Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative (Form G-28) entitling 
- - 
that person to file the appeal, the appeal is considered improperly filed. 
In the instant matter, 
 filed an appeal as counsel on behalf of the petitioner 
subsequent to the director's adverse decision with regard to the petitioner's Form 1-140. Although 
the record contains a Form G-28 showing that is authorized to undertake representation on 
behalf of the beneficiary, there is no indication on the same form that counsel is authorized to 
undertake representation on the petitioner's behalf. The requirement for the submission of a properly 
executed Form G-28 is expressly stated both in the regulations and in the Form I-290B, Notice of 
Appeal to the AAO. 
The AAO initially reviewed the record of proceeding on December 2, 2008. In light of the fact that 
the record lacked a properly executed Form G-28 authorizing representation of the 
petitioner, the AAO sent counsel a facsimile informing her of the deficiency and allowing her five 
days in which to supplement the record accordingly. To date, however, counsel has not responded 
with the required Form G-28 showing that she is authorized to represent the petitioner in the current 
proceeding. As such, the AAO concludes that the appeal was improperly filed and must be rejected 
pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(2)(v)(A)(l). 
ORDER: 
 The appeal is rejected as improperly filed.