dismissed EB-1C Case: Unknown

(b)(6)
DATE: MAY 0 1 2015 
IN RE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
FILE#: 
I-140 RECEIPT#: 
I-2908 RECEIPT# 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Service: 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Massachusetts Ave. N.W .. MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Multinational Executive or Manager Pursuant to 
Section 203(b)(l)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1 153(b)(l)(C) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
Enclosed is the non-precedent decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) for your case. 
If you believe we incorrectly decided your case, you may file a motion requesting us to reconsider our 
decision and/or reopen the proceeding. The requirements for motions are located at 8 C.F.R. § I 03 .5. 
Motions must be filed on a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) within 33 days of the date of this 
decision. The Form I-290B web page (www.uscis.gov/i-290b) contains the latest information on fee, filing 
location, and other requirements. Please do not mail any motions directly to the AAO. 
��berg 
Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
www.uscis.gov 
(b)(6)
NON-PRECEDENT DECISION 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The preference visa petitiOn was denied by the Director, Texas Service Center. The 
petitioner subsequently filed a Form 1-2908 seeking to appeal the director's decision before the 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The director erroneously treated the filing as a motion, which the 
director dismissed. The matter is now before us on a second appeal. The appeal will be dismissed as moot. 
As indicated above, the record indicates that the director erroneously treated the petitioner's first appeal as a 
motion and issued a denial. Upon review, we withdrew the director's erroneously issued decision and issued a 
decision on the original appeal, which the petitioner sought at the time of filing the Form 1-2908 (with receipt 
number : 1. Therefore, by virtue of having addressed the grounds cited in the director's original 
denial, issued on February 13, 20 14, the issues in this proceeding are moot. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed as moot.