remanded EB-1C Case: Business Operations
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the director's initial reason for denial, which was based on a failure to establish a qualifying relationship due to a stock issuance discrepancy, was found to be erroneous. The AAO determined the director misinterpreted the stock certificates. However, the AAO identified new deficiencies regarding the beneficiary's job duties, evidence that the petitioner was doing business for at least one year, and proof of simultaneous business operations, and sent the case back for a new request for evidence.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft your EB-1C petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft helps organize your evidence into a compliant petition draft grounded in USCIS criteria and attorney-style reasoning.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.