sustained
EB-1C
sustained EB-1C Case: Import/Export
Decision Summary
The petition was initially denied because the Director concluded the Petitioner failed to establish that the Beneficiary would be employed in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity. On appeal, after a de novo review, the AAO found that the supplemented record contained sufficient evidence to overcome the basis for denial and sustained the appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Or Executive Capacity
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF W-H-(USA)C-. LTD. Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: MAR. 2, 2016 APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION PETITION: FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, an import/export company, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as its general manager under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or managers. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act)ยง 203(b)(l)(C), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(1)(C). This classification allows a U.S. employer to permanently transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in an executive or managerial capacity. The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the petition. The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not establish that it seeks to employ the Beneficiary in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity, as defined at 8 C.P.R. ยง 204.5G)(2). The matter is now before us on appeal. In its appeal, the Petitioner submits a brief disputing the denial and addressing the Director's adverse findings. The Petitioner also submits copies of previously submitted materials. Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal. Upon reviewing the entire record of proceeding as supplemented by the Petitioner's submission on appeal, we conclude that the record now contains sufficient evidence to overcome the basis for the Director's decision. Specifically, the totality of the evidence now establishes that the Petitioner has shown that the Petitioner seeks to employ the Beneficiary in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity in the United States. In visa petition proceedings, the burden of proving eligibility for the benefit sought remains entirely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361. The Petitioner in the instant case has sustained that burden. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. Cite as Matter ofW-H-(USA)C-. Ltd, ID# 15708 (AAO Mar. 2, 2016)
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.