sustained EB-1C Case: Information Technology
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully demonstrated that the beneficiary was employed abroad and would be employed in the U.S. in a qualifying managerial capacity. The AAO found that counsel provided an adequate explanation for inconsistencies between two petitions, attributing them to business expansion, and that the beneficiary's duties included overseeing essential functions and professional subordinate employees.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.