dismissed EB-2 Case: Internet Services

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
Date: 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced 
Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 153(b)(2) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
?~obert P. ~ie&, Chief 
i ' 
Administrative Appeals Ofice 
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Nebraska 
Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office on appeal. The appeal will be 
dismissed. 
The petitioner is an Internet products and services company. It seeks to employ the beneficiary 
permanently in the United States as a professional services architect pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 9 1153(b)(2). As required by statute, an ETA 
Form 9089 Application for Alien Employment Certification approved by the Department of Labor 
(DOL), accompanied the petition. Upon reviewing the petition, the director determined that the 
beneficiary did not satisfy the minimum level of education required for the classification sought. 
On appeal, counsel merely expressed his belief that the director's decision was in error and stated that 
he would submit a brief andlor evidence to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) within 30 days. 
Counsel dated the appeal January 16,2006. As of September 18,2008, more than 20 months later, the 
AAO had received nothing further. Thus, on that date, this office contacted counsel by facsimile, 
advising that we had received no additional materials, inquiring as to whether anythng had been 
submitted and requesting a copy of any additional materials submitted. The facsimile advised that 
failure to respond to our inquiry within five business days may result in the summary dismissal of the 
appeal. In response, counsel confirmed that no brief had been submitted. 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
Counsel here has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any 
additional evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.