dismissed EB-2

dismissed EB-2 Case: Materials Engineering

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Materials Engineering

Decision Summary

The motion was ultimately dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary meets the Department of Labor's stringent standard for exceptional ability under Schedule A, Group II. The AAO clarified that its prior finding that the beneficiary met the USCIS definition of exceptional ability was insufficient, as the DOL standard requires a higher level of widespread acclaim and international recognition, which the submitted evidence did not establish.

Criteria Discussed

Exceptional Ability Under Schedule A, Group Ii Widespread Acclaim And International Recognition Work Requiring Exceptional Ability Membership In Associations Publication Record

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft guides you through USCIS criteria so your draft is organized around the right evidence, legal framing, and common denial patterns.

Start a Stronger Draft →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.