dismissed
EB-2
dismissed EB-2 Case: Physical Therapy
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner filed for an EB-2 classification, which requires the job to necessitate an advanced degree or its equivalent. However, the associated labor certification (Form ETA 9089) only required a bachelor's degree and no experience. The petitioner's attempt to amend the petition to a different category on appeal was deemed an impermissible material change to a deficient petition.
Criteria Discussed
Advanced Degree Exceptional Ability Job Offer Requirements
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
U. S. Citizenshiv and Immigration Services
Prevent clearly unwarranted
"vasion of personal pri vac~
-
Office ofAdministrative Appeals MS 2090
identifying data deleted to
Washington, DC 20529-2090
Prevent clearly Unwarranted
U. S. citizenship
hvasiOn of personal pi vacJ
and Immigration
Services
and ~mmi~ratfon
Services
PUE3LIC COPY n
kj 5-
Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: JUL 0 6 2009
LIN 06 191 50928
PETITION:
Immigrant petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an
Advanced Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 1 53(b)(2)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been
returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that
ofiice.
If you believe the law was inappropriately applied or you have additional information that you wish
to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. Please refer to 8
C.F.R. 5 103.5 for the specific requirements. All motions must be submitted to the office that
originally decided your case by filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of
$585. Any motion must be filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider
or reope as required by 8 C.F.R. 5 103.5(a)(l)(i).
J missom
Acting Chief, Administrative Appeals Office
DISCUSSION:
The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director,
Nebraska Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal.
The appeal will be dismissed.
The petitioner is a physical therapist placement agency.
It seeks to employ the beneficiary
permanently in the United States as a physical therapist pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(2). The petition is accompanied by a
Form ETA 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification, which was not certified by
the Department of Labor. The Form ETA 9089 indicates in Block H that the minimum level of
education required for the position is a bachelor's degree in physical therapy and that experience in
the job is not required. The Form ETA 9089 also requires a New York state physical therapy license
and the completion of a bachelor's degree program.
The director determined that the Form ETA 9089 failed to demonstrate that the job requires a
professional holding an advanced degree or the equivalent of an alien of exceptional ability and,
therefore, the beneficiary cannot be found qualified for classification as a member of the professions
holding an advanced degree or an alien of exceptional ability. 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(k)(4). The director
denied the petition accordingly.
On appeal, counsel argues that the petitioner sought classification as an advanced degree
professional or alien of exceptional ability in error by mistakenly checking block "d" in Part 2 of the
Form 1-140. Counsel asserts that the petitioner should have checked block "el' for a professional or
skilled worker pursuant to section 203(b)(3)(A) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1 1 53(b)(3)(A).
The record shows that the appeal is properly filed and timely. The procedural history in this case is
documented by the record and incorporated into the decision. Further elaboration of the procedural
history will be made only as necessary.
In pertinent part, section 203(b)(2) of the Act provides immigrant classification to members of the
professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent and whose services are sought by an
employer in the United States. An advanced degree is a United States academic or professional
degree or a foreign equivalent degree above the baccalaureate level. 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(k)(2). The
regulation further states: "A United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree
followed by at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty shall be considered the
equivalent of a master's degree. If a doctoral degree is customarily required by the specialty, the
alien must have a United States doctorate or a foreign equivalent degree." Id.
Section 203(b)(2) of the Act also includes aliens "who because of their exceptional ability in the
sciences, arts or business, will substantially benefit prospectively the national economy, cultural or
educational interests, or welfare of the United States." The regulation at 8 C.F.R. 3 204.5(k)(2)
defines "exceptional ability" as "a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily
encountered."
Page 3
Here, the Form 1-140 was filed on June 12, 2006. On Part 2.d. of the Form 1-140, the petitioner
indicated that it was filing the petition for a member of the professions holding an advanced degree
or an alien of exceptional ability.
The AAO maintains plenary power to review each appeal on a de novo basis. 5 U.S.C. $ 557(b)
("On appeal from or review of the initial decision, the agency has all the powers which it would have
in making the initial decision except as it may limit the issues on notice or by rule."); see also, Janka
v. US. Dept. of Transp., NTSB, 925 F.2d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir. 1991). The AAO's de novo authority
has been long recognized by the federal courts. See, e.g. Dor v. INS, 891 F.2d 997, 1002 n. 9 (2d
Cir. 1989). The AAO considers all pertinent evidence in the record, including new evidence
properly submitted upon appeal. On appeal, counsel submits a brief in which he argues that he
committed a "typing error" by marking Part 2.d. and that the petitioner intended to seek classification
as a professional or skilled worker. He also submits a "corrected" Form 1-140 in which box "e" is
checked.
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(k)(4) states in pertinent part that "[tlhe job offer portion of an
individual labor certification, Schedule A application, or Pilot Program application must demonstrate
that the job requires a professional holding an advanced degree or the equivalent of an alien of
exceptional ability."
In this case, the job offer portion of the Form ETA 9089 indicates that the minimum level of
education required for the position is a bachelor's degree in physical therapy and that experience in
the job is not required. The Form ETA 9089 also requires a New York state physical therapy license
and the completion of a bachelor's degree program. Accordingly, the job offer portion of the Form
ETA 9089 does not require a professional holding an advanced degree or the equivalent of an alien
of exceptional ability. However, the petitioner requested classification as a member of the
professions holding an advanced degree or an alien of exceptional ability and attempted to change
this request to that of a skilled worker or professional on appeal. A petitioner may not make material
changes to a petition in an effort to make a deficient petition conform to United States Citizenship
and Immigration Services requirements. See Matter of Izummi, 22 I&N Dec. 169, 176 (Assoc.
Comm. 1988). In this matter, the appropriate remedy would be to file another petition with the
proper fee and required documentation.
The evidence submitted does not establish that the Form ETA 9089 requires a professional holding
an advanced degree or the equivalent of an alien of exceptional ability, and the appeal must be
dismissed.
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8
U.S.C. 5 1361. The petitioner has not met that burden.
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.