dismissed
EB-2
dismissed EB-2 Case: Systems Engineering
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because it was filed untimely. The director's decision was issued on January 22, 2009, allowing 33 days for an appeal, but the appeal was not received until February 25, 2009, which was 34 days later. The AAO returned the matter to the director to be treated as a motion.
Criteria Discussed
Timeliness Of Appeal
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
· 1 identifying data deleted to prev~nt C1e~::_'y 111warranted mvaslOn of personaJ privacy PUBL1CCOpy DATE~IM ~ lS ~m~ Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: U.S. Department of Homeland Security U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 Washington, DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: PETITION: Immigrant petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.c. § 1153(b)(2) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. If you believe the law was inappropriately applied by us in reaching our decision, or you have additional information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen. The specific requirements for filing such a request can be found at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5. All motions must be submitted to the office that originally decided your case by filing a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, with a fee of $630. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i) requires that any motion must be filed within 30 days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen. Thank you, Uill) Perry Rhew Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov · ) DISCUSSION: On March 2,2007, the petitioner filed a Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, seeking the beneficiary's services as a systems engineer pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.c. §1l53(b)(2). On October 18, 2008, the Director, Nebraska Service Center (NSC), revoked the approval of the petition finding the beneficiary was not eligible for the benefit sought. The petitioner's motion to reopen and motion to reconsider was denied by the NSC director. The petitioner filed an appeal of that decision with the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). In order to properly file an appeal, the regulation at 8 c.F.R. § 103.3(a)(2)(i) provides that the affected party or the attorney or representative of record must file the complete appeal within 30 days of service of the unfavorable decision. If the decision was mailed, the appeal must be filed within 33 days. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.5a(b). The date of filing is not the date of mailing, but the date of actual receipt. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(a)(7)(i). The record indicates that the NSC director denied the petitioner's motion to reopen and motion to reconsider on January 22,2009 and gave notice to the petitioner that it had 33 days to file the appeal. Neither the Immigration and Nationality Act nor the pertinent regulations grant the AAO authority to extend this time limit. Although counsel dated the Form 1-290B February 24, 2008, it was not received by the service center until February 25, 34 days after the decision was issued. Accordingly, the appeal was untimely filed. The regulation at 8 c.F.R. § 103.3(a)(2)(v)(B)(2) states that, if an untimely appeal meets the requirements of a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider, the appeal must be treated as a motion, and a decision must be made on the merits of the case. The official having jurisdiction over a motion is the official who made the last decision in the proceeding, in this case the NSC director. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(ii). The matter will therefore be returned to the director. If the director determines that the late appeal meets the requirements of a motion, the motion shall be granted and a new decision will be issued. As the appeal was untimely filed, the appeal must be rejected. ORDER: The appeal is rejected.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.