dismissed EB-2

dismissed EB-2 Case: Unknown

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Unknown

Decision Summary

The appeal was rejected because it was filed untimely. The director's decision was issued on June 16, 2010, but the appeal was received on July 21, 2010, which was 35 days later and outside the 33-day filing period.

Criteria Discussed

Timely Filing Of Appeal

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
identifying d'lta deleted to 
prevent Ck"'Jili'Jv:lrranted 
invasion of personal privacy 
~LICCOP~ 
FILE: 
IN RE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
u.s. Department of Homeland Security 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Office of Administrative Appeals MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529ยท2090 
u. S. Ci tizenshi p 
and Immigration 
Services 
Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DatesEP 0 9 2010 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced 
Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U,S,c. ยง IIS3(b)(2) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents 
related to this matter have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that 
any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. 
Thank you, 
~~ ~ Perry Rhew 
Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
www.uscis.gov 
-. 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the employment-based immigrant visa 
petition. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The AAO will 
reject the appeal as untimely filed. 
In order to properly file an appeal, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(2)(i) provides that the 
affected party must file the complete appeal within 30 days of after service of the unfavorable 
decision. If the decision was mailed, the appeal must be filed within 33 days. See 8 c.F.R. ยง 
103.5a(b). The date of filing is not the date of mailing, but the date of actual receipt. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 
103.2(a)(7)(i). 
The director denied the petition on Wednesday, June 16,2010. The director properly allowed the 
petitioner 33 days to file the appeal. Although counsel dated the appeal July 16, 2010, it was 
postmarked Monday, July 19,2010, and received by the director on Wednesday, July 21, 2010, 35 
days after the decision was issued. Accordingly, the appeal was untimely filed. 
As the appeal was untimely filed and does not qualify as a motion, the appeal must be rejected. 
ORDER: The appeal is rejected. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.