dismissed
EB-2
dismissed EB-2 Case: Unknown
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to submit a brief or additional evidence after indicating they would. Since no specific errors of law or fact from the director's decision were identified or argued, the AAO dismissed the appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Ability To Pay Progressive Experience Failure To File A Brief
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
'. DATIDEC 1 8 2012 OFFICE NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER I)\i RE PL'titioncr: Bellefic iary: V.S. Department of Homeland Securit}' U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office lAAO) 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 Washinglon, DC 20529-2090 u.s. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: PETITIO)\: Immigrant Pctitinn for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 V.S.c. ยง 1153(b)(2) 0:\ BElIALI' OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: Enclosed pIcase find the dccision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All of the documents related to this malter have heen rcturned to the office that originally decided your case. Please be advised that ally further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office. If you helieve the ;\;\0 1I1approprialCly applied the law in reaching its decision, or you have additional information that you wish to have considered, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen in accordance with the instructions on Form I-290B. Notice of Appeal or Malian. with a fce of $630. The specific requircments for filing such a motion can be found at 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5. Do not file any motion directly with the AAO. Please be aware that 8 C.F.R, ยง 1 03.5(a)(1 )0) requires any motion to be filed within JO days of the decision that the motion seeks to reconsider or reopen. Thank you. (1m ROil Rosenht:rg Acting Chief. Administrative Appeals Office --Page I DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petltlon was denied by the Director, Nehraska Service Centcr. and is now he fore the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will hc summarily dismissed. The petitioner seeks to classify the beneficiary pursuant to section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. g USC ยง 1153(b)(2) which provides immigrant classification to members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent and whose services are sought by an employer in the United States. An advanced degree is a United States academic or professional degree or a I'oreign equi valent degree above the baccalaureate level. 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(k)(2). The regulation fUl1her states: "A United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty shall be considered the equivalcnt of a master's degree. If a doctoral degree is customarily required by the specialty, the alien must have a United States doctorate or a foreign equivalent degree." /d. The director determined that the petitioner failed to demonstrate a continuing ability to pay the proffered wage beginning on the priority date. The director also noted that the required five years of progressive experience was not established, as required in the labor certification. On appeal. counsel merely stated, "brief ancl/or additional evidence will be submitted to the AAO within 30 days." Coulbcl dated the apreal Octoher 20. 20 I 1. As of this date. morc than a year later, the AAO has reccived nothing further. and the regulation requires that any brief shall be submitted directly to the AAO. 11 C.F.R. ~~ I OJ.J(a)(l)(vii) and (viii). As stated in II C.F.R. * 103.3(a)(I)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned fails to identify srecifically any elToneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. Counsel here has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for appeal and has not provided any additional evidence. He has not even expressed disagreement with the director's decision. The arreal must therefore be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.