dismissed EB-2 Case: Unknown

(b)(6)
DATE: 
JUN 3 0 2015 
INRE: Petitioner: 
Beneficiary: 
FILE#: 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 
20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
PETITION RECEIPT #: 
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or 
Aliens of Exceptional Abilities Pursuant to Section 203(b )(2)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)(A) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
Enclosed is the non-precedent decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) for your case. 
If you believe we incorrectly decided your case, you may file a motion requesting us to reconsider our 
decision and/or reopen the proceeding. The requirements for motions are located at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5. 
Motions must be filed on a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) within 33 days of the date of this 
decision. The Form I-290B web page (www.uscis.gov/i-290b) contains the latest information on fee, filing 
location, and other requirements. Please do not mail any motions directly to the AAO. 
Thank you, 
h./ _fr 
6~Ro~enberg 
Chief, Administrative Appeals Office 
(b)(6)
NON-PRECEDENT DECISION 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the employment-based immigrant visa 
petition and the matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal 
will be summarily dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks to classify the beneficiary pursuant to Section 203(b )(2)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)(A) as a member of the professions possessing an 
advanced degree. The director determined that the petitioner did not demonstrate a continuing ability to 
pay the proffered wage beginning on the priority date. 
On appeal, the petitioner indicated that a brief and/or additional 
evidence would be submitted within 30 
days of filing the appeal. The appeal was received on February 26, 2015. As of this date, more than 
four months later, we have received nothing further, and the regulation requires that any brief shall be 
submitted directly to us. 8 C.P.R. §§ 103.3(a)(2)(vii) and (viii). 
As stated in 8 C.P.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned 
does not identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. The 
petitioner here has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any 
additional evidence. 1 It has not even expressed disagreement with the director's decision. The 
appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed. 
1 The petitioner did not provide a statement regarding the basis for the appeal, as required in Part 4 of the Form I-290B.