EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Autism Education Research (2017): the motion to reopen and reconsider was denied because the
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reopen and reconsider was denied because the petitioner failed to meet the second and third prongs of the Dhanasar framework. While her research on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) education was found to have merit and importance, she did not sufficiently demonstrate that she was well-positioned to advance the endeavor. The evidence provided, such as publications and presentations, largely post-dated the original petition filing and did not show significant influence or progress in the field.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.