Dismissed
EB-2 NIW
EB-2 NIW Dismissed — Chemical Engineering (2005): did not meet the third prong of the national interest
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the third prong of the national interest waiver test. While the petitioner's research in bioseparation technology was in an area of intrinsic merit, he did not establish that he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a qualified U.S. worker, as there was insufficient evidence that the broader chemical and pharmaceutical industries had adopted or utilized his contributions.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Employment In An Area Of Substantial Intrinsic Merit Proposed Benefit Will Be National In Scope Alien Will Serve The National Interest To A Substantially Greater Degree Than A U.S. Worker
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.