EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Cyber-Physical Systems (2024): did not establish he is well-positioned to advance his
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that he is well-positioned to advance his proposed endeavor, the second prong of the Dhanasar framework. The Director found the evidence did not show the petitioner had a significant role in past projects, a record of success, or concrete plans like a registered company or correspondence with potential customers to support his entrepreneurial venture. The AAO affirmed this finding, declining to consider new evidence submitted on appeal.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.