EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Experimental Nuclear Physics (2024): did not establish they were well-positioned to advance
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish they were well-positioned to advance their proposed endeavor. Although the endeavor was found to have substantial merit and national importance, the evidence provided, including letters of support and publications, did not sufficiently demonstrate a record of success or significant impact in the field. The AAO found the letters to be scant and determined that the petitioner's citation record did not reflect a level of interest sufficient to meet the standard.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.