EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Immunology (2025): did not establish they were well-positioned to advance
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate they were well-positioned to advance their proposed endeavor under the Dhanasar framework. The Director and the AAO concluded that the evidence did not establish the petitioner's research was influential beyond adding to the general pool of knowledge. The petitioner also failed to show sufficient progress toward achieving the proposed endeavor, thus not meeting the second and third prongs for a national interest waiver.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.