EB-2 NIW Dismissed — Materials Science And Engineering (2005): did not meet the third prong of the national interest
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the third prong of the national interest waiver test. While the petitioner's work in developing alloys was found to have intrinsic merit and be national in scope, he did not establish that his past achievements had a significant degree of influence on the field as a whole. The submitted letters of support contained general praise but lacked specific evidence, such as citations or firsthand accounts from research teams applying his work, to demonstrate that he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a qualified U.S. worker.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.