EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Neurology (2010): did not establish the benefit of their work would be
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the benefit of their work would be national in scope. The AAO determined that the petitioner's duties as a practicing physician and Chief Neurology Resident were primarily of local, not national, benefit. Arguments about potential future research and consulting were found to be speculative and not supported by the evidence, such as the petitioner's one-year fellowship agreement which did not include research duties.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.