EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Pharmacy (2023): the motion to reconsider was dismissed because the
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The motion to reconsider was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy. The AAO reaffirmed its previous finding that the petitioner's telepharmacy endeavor lacked sufficient evidence to prove it had 'national importance' as required under the Dhanasar framework. The petitioner's arguments were considered a disagreement with the discretionary determination rather than proof of an error in the original decision.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.