EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Physics Research (2015): did not establish a continued impact on his field after
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to demonstrate a continued impact on his field after graduating with his Ph.D. While his graduate research was influential and highly cited, he did not provide evidence of publishing new research or creating new technologies that affected the field as a whole during his subsequent employment. Therefore, the AAO concluded his past achievements as a student were not a reliable indicator of his future contributions to the national interest.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.