EB-2 NIW Dismissed โ Podiatry: did not establish the benefit of his work would be national
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner, a podiatrist, failed to demonstrate that the benefit of his work would be national in scope, as his impact would be limited to the local patients he treats. He also failed to establish that he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a qualified U.S. worker, as his claims of unique skills and the impact of his scholarly article were found to be based on anecdotal observation rather than scientific research.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? Learn from this denial.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO flagged here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.