dismissed
EB-2 NIW
dismissed EB-2 NIW Case: Research
Decision Summary
The motion was dismissed because the petitioner had already obtained lawful permanent resident status through a different, approved employment-based petition. As the petitioner's status was already adjusted, the AAO considered the matter moot.
Criteria Discussed
Member Of The Professions Holding An Advanced Degree National Interest Waiver
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration FILE: Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: JUN 0 3 2005 IN RE: Petitioner: Beneficiary: PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 9 1 153(b)(2) ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS : This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. &Robert P. Administrative Appeals Office DISCUSSION: The Director, Vermont Service Center, denied the employment-based immigrant visa petition. The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) dismissed a subsequent appeal. The matter is now before the AAO on motion. The motion will be dismissed. The petitioner seeks classification pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationalrty Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. tj 1153(b)(2), as an alien of exceptional ability or as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The petitioner asserts that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer, ar~d thus of a labor certification, is in the national interest of the United States. The director found that the petitioner qualifies for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that the petitioner had not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest ofthe United States. The AAO concurred with the director. On motion, counsel challenges the AAO's conclusions. A review of Citizenship and Immigration Services' records reveals that the petitioner is the another employment-based visa petition filed in his behalf by Yale University, receipt number The director approved that petition on May 9, 2001. Subsequently, Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, Form 1-485, receipt numbe The director approved that application on March 19, 2002. Because the alien has status, further pursuit of the matter at hand is moot. ORDER: The motion is dismissed, based on the alien's adjustment to lawful permanent resident status.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.