dismissed EB-2 NIW Case: Research Analyst

identifying data deleted t6, 
prevent clc . : 
.i-?.L7 ,mted 
ksion of p~m-1J pdvacy 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. 3000 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
PUBLIC COPY bj- 
FILE: Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: JAN 0 9 m7 
LIN 03 266 5 1725 
PETITION: 
 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced 
Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. $ 1 1 53(b)(2) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
.$- Robert P. Wiem !id n, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DISCUSSION: 
 The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, 
Nebraska Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office on appeal. The appeal 
will be dismissed. 
The petitioner seeks classification pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1153(b)(2), as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. The 
petitioner seeks employment as a research analyst. The petitioner asserts that an exemption from the 
requirement of a job offer, and thus of an alien employment certification, is in the national interest of 
the United States. In a six-page decision, the director found that the petitioner qualifies for the 
classification, but that the petitioner had not established that an exemption from the requirement of a job 
offer would be in the national interest of the United States. 
On appeal, counsel indicates that she is not submitting a separate brief or evidence. Under reasons for 
the appeal, she states only: 
Re-consideration of existing evidence 
Misapplication of the law 
As stated in 8 C.F.R. 5 103.3(a)(l)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
Counsel here has not speclficaly addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any 
additional evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.