dismissed EB-2 NIW Case: Unknown

./
'" \i
.1 ."
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn.3000
Washington, DC 20529
u.S.Citizenship
and Immigration
Services ~
<Os
FILE:' ..
LIN 04 071 52340
Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: fEe () 2. 1"1
INRE: Petitioner:
Beneficiary:
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced
Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:
INSTRUCTIONS:
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office.
~~~
%bert P. Wiemann, Chief
Administrative Appeals Office-
www.uscis.gov
A
I
DISCUSSION: The employment-based immigrant visa petition was denied by the Director, Nebraska
Service Center, and is now before the Administrative Appeals Office on appeal. The appeal will be
dismissed.
The petitioner seeks classification pursuant to section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act
(the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2), as an alien of exceptional ability or a member of the professions
holding an advanced degree. The petitioner asserts that an exemption from the requirement of a job
offer, and thus of a labor certification, is in the national interest of the United States. The director found
that the petitioner qualifies for the classification sought, but that the petitioner had not established that
an exemption from the requirement of a job offer would be in the national interest ofthe United States.
-
On appeal, the petitioner indicated that no brief or additional evidence was enclosed and requested "re-
consideration of existing evidence."
As stated in 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed if the party concerned
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal.
The petitioner here has not specifically addressed the reasons stated for denial and has not provided any
additional evidence. The appeal must therefore be summarily dismissed.
ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.