dismissed EB-2 NIW

dismissed EB-2 NIW Case: Unknown

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Unknown

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to meet the procedural requirements for an appeal. Specifically, the petitioner did not identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact from the director's initial decision.

Criteria Discussed

8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(A)(1)(V)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF G-A- LLC 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: JAN. 25. 2018 
APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner seeks second preference immigrant classification as a member of the professions 
holding an advanced degree, as well as a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement 
attached to this EB-2 classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 
203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1153(b)(2). The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition. 
The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. 
An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned 
fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 
8 C.F.R. ยง 1 03.3(a)(l )(v). 
On the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional 
evidence is attached. However. the Petitioner's statement in support of the appeal does not 
specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being 
appealed. Because the Petitioner has not identified any specific. erroneous conclusion of law or 
statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. 
ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C .F .R. ยง 103 .3( a)( I )(v). 
Cite as Matter ofG-A- LLC, ID# 1264568 (AAO Jan. 25, 2018) 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.