dismissed EB-2 NIW

dismissed EB-2 NIW Case: Unknown

📅 Date unknown 👤 Individual 📂 Unknown

Decision Summary

The motion to reopen was dismissed on procedural grounds. It was filed one day late, 34 days after the decision was issued, and the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the delay was reasonable and beyond her control. Additionally, the motion did not contain a required statement regarding judicial proceedings.

Criteria Discussed

Timeliness Of Motion To Reopen Procedural Requirements For Motion

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
(b)(6)
DATE : 
IN RE: 
PETITION: 
JUL 3 1 2014 
Petitioner : 
Beneficiary: 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 
Office of Administrative Appeals 
20 Massachusett s Ave., N.W., MS 2090 
Washington, DC 20529-2090 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
Office: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER FILE : 
Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced 
Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2) 
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in your case . 
This is a non-precedent decision. The AAO does not announce new constructions of law nor establish agency 
policy throu gh non-precedent decisions. If you believe the AAO incorrectly applied current law or policy to 
your case or if you seek to present new facts for consideration, you may file a motion to reconsider or a 
motion to reopen , respectively. Any motion must be filed on a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) 
within 33 days of the date of this decision. Please review the Form I-290B instructions at 
http://w"vw.uscis.gov/forms for· the latest information on fee, filing location, and other requirements. 
See also 8 C.F .R. § I 03.5 . Do not file a motion directly with the AAO. 
Thank you, 
r~~ftat;ve Appeals Office 
'\'vww.uscis.gov 
(b)(6)
NON-PRECEDENTDEC§ION 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. The 
Administrative Appeals Office dismissed a subsequent appeal. The matter is now before us on motion 
to reopen. The motion will be dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i), 103.5(a)(l)(iii)(C), 
and 103.5(a)(4). 
In order to properly file a motion to reopen, the regulation at 8 C.F.R . § 103.5(a)(l)(i) provides that 
the petitioner must file the motion within 30 days of the decision. If the decision was mailed, the 
motion must be filed within 33 days. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.8(b). The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 1.2 
explains that when the last day of a period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period 
shall run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. The date of 
filing is not the date of submission, but the date of actual receipt with the proper signature and the 
required fee. See 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(a)(7)(i). 
The record indicates that we issued our decision on January 29, 2014. We properly gave notice to 
the petitioner that she had 33 days to file a motion. The Form I-290B , Notice of Appeal or Motion, 
was received by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on March 4, 2014, or 34 days after the 
decision was issued. Accordingly, the motion was untimely filed. 
As it relates to motions to reopen, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(i) provides that "failure to 
file before this period expires, may be excused in the discretion of the Service where it is 
demonstrated that the delay was reasonable and was beyond the control of the applicant or 
petitioner." In this matter, the petitioner's motion was not properly filed within the required thirty days 
and she has not demonstrated that this delay was reasonable and beyond her control. The motion 
must therefore be dismissed as untimely filed. In addition, the instant motion does not contain the 
statement about whether or not the validity of the unfavorable decision has been or is the subject of 
any judicial proceeding as required by the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(iii)(C). 
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(4) states that "[a] motion that does not meet applicable 
requirements shall be dismissed." Accordingly, the motion will be dismissed, the proceedings will not 
be reopened, and the previous decision will not be disturbed. 
ORDER: The motion to reopen is dismissed, our January 29, 2014 decision is affirmed, and the 
petition remains denied. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial

MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.

Avoid This in My Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.