Remanded
EB-2 NIW
EB-2 NIW Remanded — Biomedical Research (2024): the AAO found that the Director erred in determining the
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The AAO found that the Director erred in determining the petitioner's research on Type 1 diabetes did not have national importance. However, the AAO also concluded that the Director's analysis for the 'well-positioned' prong was insufficient and lacked a specific explanation. Therefore, the case was remanded for a new decision consistent with the AAO's analysis.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Substantial Merit And National Importance Well-Positioned To Advance The Proposed Endeavor Waiver Of The Job Offer Requirement Would Benefit The United States
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.