Remanded
EB-2 NIW
EB-2 NIW Remanded โ Medicine (2005): the director applied the incorrect legal standard
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the director applied the incorrect legal standard. Instead of evaluating the petition under the specific criteria for alien physicians seeking a National Interest Waiver (8 C.F.R. ยง 204.12), the director incorrectly requested evidence based on the general three-prong test established in Matter of New York State Department of Transportation.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Physician Service In A Medically Underserved Area 5-Year Service Commitment Public Interest Attestation Letter Matter Of New York State Dept. Of Transportation (Nysdot) Three-Prong Test
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.