Remanded
EB-2 NIW
EB-2 NIW Remanded โ Medicine (2003): the Director erred in finding the petitioner's medical
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director erred in finding the petitioner's medical research was not national in scope, as research findings are disseminated nationally. The Director also improperly applied a higher standard of achievement and did not account for procedural omissions, such as the missing Form ETA-750B, which must be requested from the petitioner.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
National Scope Of Work Petitioner'S Achievements And Influence Independent Witness Testimony Citations Of Published Work Procedural Requirements (Form Eta-750B)
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See where you stand.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to USCIS criteria โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.