remanded EB-2 NIW

remanded EB-2 NIW Case: Unknown

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Individual ๐Ÿ“‚ Unknown

Decision Summary

The Director's decision was withdrawn and the matter was remanded because the Director improperly dismissed the Petitioner's motion to reopen/reconsider as untimely. The AAO found that the motion was filed within the 33-day window allowed for decisions served by mail. The case was returned for the Director to adjudicate the motions on their merits.

Criteria Discussed

Timeliness Of Motion To Reopen/Reconsider

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
Non-Precedent Decision of the
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date: JAN. 22, 2025 In Re: 35504749 
Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision 
Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers (National Interest Waiver) 
The Petitioner seeks employment-based second preference (EB-2) immigrant classification as a 
member of the professions holding an advanced degree, as well as a national interest waiver of the job 
offer requirement attached to this classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) 
section 203(b )(2), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1 l 53(b )(2). 
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding the record did not 
establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the 
national interest. The Petitioner subsequently filed a motion to reopen and motion to reconsider, which 
the Director dismissed as untimely filed. The matter is now before us on appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 
ยง 103.3. 
The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence. 
Matter ofChawathe, 25 l&N Dec. 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010). We review the questions in this matter 
de novo. Matter of Christo 's, Inc., 26 I&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de novo review, 
we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent 
with the following analysis. 
The sole issue before us on appeal is whether the Director properly dismissed the Petitioner's motion 
to reopen and motion to reconsider as untimely filed. Motions to reopen or reconsider must be filed 
within 30 days of the decision, or 33 days if the decision is served by mail. 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.5(a)(l)(i), 
103.8(b). Here, the record reflects that the Director's decision was issued on June 17, 2024, and that 
the Petitioner's Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, was received by USCIS on July 19, 2024, 
32 days after that decision.1 Since the Petitioner's Form I-290B was received within 33 days of the 
decision, the motions appear to have been timely filed. Therefore, we will remand the matter for the 
Director to adjudicate the motions on their merits. 
ORDER: The Director's decision is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for the entry of a new 
decision consistent with the foregoing analysis. 
1 The Petitioner submitted a mailing receipt and delivery confirmation page with his appeal. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Draft your EB-2 NIW petition with AAO precedents

MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.

Sign Up Free →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.