remanded
EB-2 NIW
remanded EB-2 NIW Case: Unknown
Decision Summary
The appeal was rejected because it was filed untimely, 34 days after the decision was issued, exceeding the 33-day limit. However, the AAO returned the case to the director to be treated as a motion to reopen and reconsider, in accordance with regulations.
Criteria Discussed
Timely Filing Of Appeal Treating Untimely Appeal As A Motion To Reopen Or Reconsider
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
IdentifYing data deleted ttl
prevent clc11'!:Y !.:!1''v:]r(;,!(,it'(l
invasion of personal pnviO">,
PUBLIC COPY
IN RE: Petitioner:
Beneficiary:
NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER
U.S. Department of Homeland S('curi~'
U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Service~
Administrative Appeals Office (AAO)
20 MassachuscHS Ave .. ':'..W., MS 2090
Washington, DC 20529-2090
U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced
Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b)(2) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act, 8 USC ยง IIS3(b)(2)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER
SELF-REPRESENTED
INSTRUCTIONS:
Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case, All of the documents
related to this mattcr have been returned to the office that originally decided your case, Please be advised that
any further inquiry that you might have concerning your case must be made to that office,
Perry Rhcw
Chief, Administrative Appeals Office
www,uscis.gov
DISCUSSION: The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition. The
matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be
rejected as untimely filed. The AAO will return the matter to the director for consideration as a
motion to reopen and reconsider.
In order to properly file an appeal, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(2)(i) provides that the
affected party or the attorney or representative of record must submit the complete appeal within 30
days of service of the unfavorable decision. If the decision was mailed, three days are added to the
prescribed period and the appeal must be filed within 33 days. See 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.8(b). The date of
filing is not the date of submission. but the date of actual receipt with the required fee. See 8 C.F.R.
ยง 103.2(a)(7)(i).
The director issued the decision on January 20, 2012. The director properly gave notice to the
petitioner that it had 33 days to file the appeal. Neither the Immigration and Nationality Act nor the
pertinent regulations grant the AAO authority to extend this time limit.
Although the petitioner dated the Form I-290B February 17,2012, it was not received by the service
center until Thursday, February 23, 2012, or 34 days after the decision was issued. Accordingly, the
appeal was untimely filed.
The regulation at 8 C.F.R. ยง 103.3(a)(2)(v)(B)(2) states that, if an untimely appeal meets the
requirements of a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider, the appeal must be treated as a motion,
and a decision must be made on the merits of the case. The official having jurisdiction over a
motion is the official who made the last decision in the proceeding, in this case the Director of the
Nebraska Service Center. See 8 C.F.R. ยง I03.S(a)(l)(ii).
The matter will therefore be returned to the director. If the director determines that the late appeal
meets the requirements of a motion, the motion shall be granted and a new decision will be issued.
As the appeal was untimely filed, the appeal must be rejected.
ORDER: The appeal is rejected. Draft your EB-2 NIW petition with AAO precedents
MeritDraft uses real AAO decisions to generate compliant petition arguments tailored to your evidence.
Sign Up Free →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.