sustained
EB-2 NIW
sustained EB-2 NIW Case: Biological Research
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner, a research scientist, provided sufficient evidence on appeal to demonstrate their influence on the field of biological research. The AAO found that the petitioner's past record of achievement in studying mRNA turnover, evidenced by impactful publications and citations, justified the projection of future benefit to the national interest to a degree substantially greater than a minimally qualified U.S. worker.
Criteria Discussed
Advanced Degree Substantial Intrinsic Merit National In Scope Serving National Interest To A Greater Degree Than A U.S. Worker Past History Of Achievement Influence On The Field
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.