EB-2 NIW Sustained โ Biomedical Science (2005): the petitioner provided substantial evidence, including
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided substantial evidence, including letters from highly respected experts, demonstrating the national importance of their research in biomedical science (proteomics and mass spectrometry). The AAO was persuaded that the petitioner's unique skills and contributions to research on acute lung injury were so significant that they would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a minimally qualified U.S. worker, thus warranting a waiver.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.