EB-2 NIW Sustained — Cancer Research (2005): the director denied the petition, acknowledging the
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The director denied the petition, acknowledging the petitioner's work in cancer research had intrinsic merit and was national in scope, but found insufficient evidence that her contributions were substantially greater than a minimally qualified U.S. worker. The AAO sustained the appeal, indicating that upon review of the evidence, including publications and strong testimonial letters from experts detailing her novel research on cell cycle regulation and tumorigenesis, the petitioner did in fact establish that she would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.