sustained EB-2 NIW Case: Catalysis / Surface Science
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that the petitioner, a research scientist, established that a waiver of the job offer requirement was in the national interest. The decision highlighted the significant and substantial nature of the petitioner's research in catalysis, particularly her work on using titanium dioxide to split water into hydrogen, a potential alternative energy source to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil. Testimonials from leading experts confirmed the petitioner's original and impactful contributions, satisfying the criteria for a national interest waiver.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.