sustained EB-2 NIW

sustained EB-2 NIW Case: Electrical Engineering

πŸ“… Date unknown πŸ‘€ Individual πŸ“‚ Electrical Engineering

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the petitioner established eligibility for a national interest waiver under the Dhanasar framework. The AAO concluded that the petitioner's proposed research in numerical analysis and computational electromagnetics has both substantial merit and national importance due to its diverse applications in areas like electricity generation, environmental monitoring, and medical technology.

Criteria Discussed

Substantial Merit And National Importance Well Positioned To Advance The Proposed Endeavor Beneficial To The U.S. To Waive Job Offer/Labor Certification

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 24826197 
Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date: MAR. 21, 2023 
Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker (National Interest Waiver) 
The Petitioner, an electrical engineering researcher, seeks second preference immigrant classification 
as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, as well as a national interest waiver of 
the job offer requirement attached to this EB-2 classification . See Immigration and Nationality Act 
(the Act) section 203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. Β§ 1153(b)(2). 
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner qualified 
for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that he had not 
established that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the 
national interest. The matter is now before us on appeal. 8 C.F.R. Β§ 103.3. 
On appeal, the Petitioner submits additional documentation and a brief asserting that he is eligible for 
a national interest waiver. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by a 
preponderance of the evidence. Matter ofChawathe , 25 l&N Dec. 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010). We 
review the questions in this matter de novo. Matter of Christo 's, Inc., 26 I&N Dec. 537,537 n.2 (AAO 
2015). Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal. 
I. LAW 
To establish eligibility for a national interest waiver, a petitioner must first demonstrate qualification 
for the underlying EB-2 visa classification , as either an advanced degree professional or an individual 
of exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business . Because this classification requires that the 
individual's services be sought by a U.S. employer, a separate showing is required to establish that a 
waiver of the job offer requirement is in the national interest. 
Section 203(b) of the Act sets out this sequential framework: 
(2) Aliens who are members of the professions holding advanced degrees or aliens of 
exceptional ability. -
(A) In general. - Visas shall be made available .. . to qualified immigrants who are 
members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent or 
who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business, will 
substantially benefit prospectively the national economy, cultural or 
educational interests, or welfare of the United States, and whose services in the 
sciences, arts, professions, or business are sought by an employer in the United 
States. 
(B) Waiver of job offer-
(i) National interest waiver. ... [T]he Attorney General may, when the Attorney 
General deems it to be in the national interest, waive the requirements of 
subparagraph (A) that an alien's services in the sciences, arts, professions, or 
business be sought by an employer in the United States. 
While neither the statute nor the pertinent regulations define the term "national interest," we set forth 
a framework for adjudicating national interest waiver petitions in the precedent decision Matter of 
Dhanasar, 26 T&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016). Dhanasar states that after a petitioner has established 
eligibility for EB-2 classification, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) may, as a 
matter of discretion, 1 grant a national interest waiver if the petitioner demonstrates: (1) that the foreign 
national's proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance; (2) that the foreign 
national is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor; and (3) that, on balance, it would be 
beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. 
The first prong, substantial merit and national importance, focuses on the specific endeavor that the 
foreign national proposes to undertake. The endeavor's merit may be demonstrated in a range of areas 
such as business, entrepreneurialism, science, technology, culture, health, or education. In 
determining whether the proposed endeavor has national importance, we consider its potential 
prospective impact. 
The second prong shifts the focus from the proposed endeavor to the foreign national. To determine 
whether he or she is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, we consider factors including, 
but not limited to: the individual's education, skills, knowledge and record of success in related or 
similar efforts; a model or plan for future activities; any progress towards achieving the proposed 
endeavor; and the interest of potential customers, users, investors, or other relevant entities or 
individuals. 
The third prong requires the petitioner to demonstrate that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the 
United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. In performing 
this analysis, USCIS may evaluate factors such as: whether, in light of the nature of the foreign 
national's qualifications or the proposed endeavor, it would be impractical either for the foreign 
national to secure a job offer or for the petitioner to obtain a labor certification; whether, even assuming 
that other qualified U.S. workers are available, the United States would still benefit from the foreign 
national's contributions; and whether the national interest in the foreign national's contributions is 
sufficiently urgent to warrant forgoing the labor certification process. In each case, the factor(s) 
1 See also Poursina v. USCIS, No. 17-16579, 2019 WL 4051593 (Aug. 28, 2019) (finding USCIS' decision to grant or 
deny a national interest waiver to be discretionmy in nature). 
2 
considered must, taken together, indicate that on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States 
to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. 2 
TI. ANALYSIS 
The Director found that the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced 
degree. 3 The sole issue to be determined is whether the Petitioner has established that a waiver of the 
requirement of a job offer, and thus a labor certification, would be in the national interest. 
At the time of filing, the Petitioner was serving as an assistant professor and researcher at thel I 
University I _ Iran. Regarding his work atl !University, 
the Petitioner stated: 
My main research focus has been the introduction, design, formulation, 
implementation, and development of new numerical algorithms for solving integral 
equations, integro-differential and differential equations, and computational 
electromagnetics problems. I have published more than 30 peer reviewed articles in 
various international journals as the outcome of my research. 
With regard to his proposed endeavor, the Petitioner indicated that he intended to continue his research 
on the above numerical analysis and computational methods in the United States, and "will focus 
particularly on linear Fredholm integral equations, which are widely used for modeling and analysis 
of many physical and engineering problems; linear differential equations of arbitrary order and 
coefficients, which are widely used in many engineering applications; and electromagnetic scattering 
analysis, which supports a wide variety ofreal-world applications." The Petitioner submitted evidence 
that he has applied with the I I research group of the I I I for the positions of "postdoctoral associate in wireless sensing and 
electromagnetics" and "postdoctoral associate in wireless biomedical sensing and antennae." 4 On 
appeal, he presents additional information about the work of I research 
group. For the reasons discussed below, we conclude the Petitioner has established eligibility for a 
national interest waiver under the analytical framework set forth in Dhanasar. 
A. Substantial Merit and National Importance of the Proposed Endeavor 
As evidence that his proposed research has substantial merit and national importance, the Petitioner 
presented letters of support discussing his development of high-speed algorithms for solving integroΒ­
differential, differential, and integral equations and lower-difficulty methods for analyzing problems 
related to electromagnetic scattering and radiation structures, and indicating his work has applications 
2 See Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. at 888-91, for elaboration on these three prongs. 
3 The Petitioner presented his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from !University in Iran. He also submitted an 
academic evaluation report which concluded that the aforementioned degree is the foreign equivalent of a Ph.D. in 
Electrical Engineering from an accredited college or university in the United States. 
4 As the Petitioner is applying for a waiver of the job offer requirement, it is not necessary for him to have a job offer from 
a specific employer. However, we will consider information about his position at I I University in Iran and his 
desired positions at to illustrate the capacity in which he intends to work in order to determine whether his proposed 
endeavor meets the requirements of the Dhanasar framework. 
3 
in diverse applications including improving the efficiency of electricity generation, measuring 
pollutants in an environment, and enhancing medical imaging technology. Additionally, the Petitioner 
has submitted documentation indicating that the benefit of his proposed research involving 
computational electromagnetics has broader implications for the field, as the results are disseminated 
to others in the field through scientific journals and conferences. As the Petitioner has demonstrated 
both the substantial merit and national importance of his proposed research, he has established that he 
meets the first prong of the Dhanasar framework. 
B. Well Positioned to Advance the Proposed Endeavor 
The second prong shifts the focus from the proposed endeavor to the Petitioner. The record includes 
his curriculum vitae, academic records (including his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering), published 
work, peer review activity, and documentation of numerous articles that cited to his research findings. 5 
In addition, the Petitioner offered reference letters describing his expertise in numerical analysis and 
computational electromagnetics and his past record of success in those research areas. Several expert 
references identify specific examples of how the Petitioner's research progress relating to those research 
areas has affected his field. As corroborating documentation regarding the significance of his work, the 
Petitioner provided evidence showing that his published work has been frequently cited by independent 
researchers. On appeal, he presents the 2022 U.S. National Science and Technology Council's updated 
list of critical and emerging technologies. His experience and expertise as an electrical engineering 
researcher, published articles, citation evidence, and progress in his field position him well to advance 
his proposed endeavor. Accordingly, the Petitioner has demonstrated that he satisfies the second prong 
of the Dhanasar framework. 
C. Balancing Factors to Determine Waiver's Benefit to the United States 
As explained above, the third prong requires the petitioner to demonstrate that, on balance, it would 
be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor 
certification. 6 As an electrical engineering researcher with a Ph.D., the Petitioner possesses considerable 
experience and expertise in his research field. The Petitioner has documented his past successes in 
advancing research relating to numerical analysis and computational electromagnetics and publishing 
influential research findings. The record also demonstrates the widespread scientific benefits associated 
with research progress in the development of efficient numerical algorithms to address problems in the 
field of electrical engineering. Based on the Petitioner's track record of successful research and the 
significance of his proposed work to advance U.S. scientific interests, we conclude that he offers 
contributions of such value that, on balance, they would benefit the United States even assuming that 
5 "USCIS considers an advanced degree, particularly a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), in a STEM field tied to the proposed 
endeavor and related to work furthering a critical and emerging technology or other STEM area important to U.S. 
competitiveness or national security, an especially positive factor to be considered along with other evidence for purposes 
of the assessment under the second prong." See 6 USCIS Policy Manual F.5(D)(2), https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual. 
6 When evaluating the third prong, USCIS considers the following combination of facts contained in the record to be a 
strong positive factor: 
β€’ The person possesses an advanced STEM degree, particularly a Ph.D.; 
β€’ The person will be engaged in work furthering a critical and emerging technology or other STEM area important 
to U.S. competitiveness; and 
β€’ The person is well positioned to advance the proposed STEM endeavor of national importance. 
See USCIS Policy Manual, supra, at F.5(D)(2). 
4 
other qualified U.S. workers are available. The Petitioner, therefore, meets the third prong of the 
Dhanasar framework. 
III. CONCLUSION 
The Petitioner has met the requisite three prongs set forth in the Dhanasar analytical framework. We 
conclude that he has established he is eligible for and otherwise merits a national interest waiver as a 
matter of discretion. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 
5 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.