EB-2 NIW Sustained โ Mechanical Engineering (2015): the petitioner provided compelling evidence, including
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on โ free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided compelling evidence, including letters from independent experts and industry leaders, demonstrating the significant influence and adoption of his research on shot peening within the aerospace industry. The evidence established that his numerical models were considered revolutionary, had become an industry standard, and solved long-standing problems, which satisfied the requirement that he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a minimally qualified U.S. worker.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here โ free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria โNo credit card required.