sustained EB-2 NIW

sustained EB-2 NIW Case: Medical Research

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Individual ๐Ÿ“‚ Medical Research

Decision Summary

The director initially denied the petition, agreeing that the petitioner's cancer research was of intrinsic merit and national in scope, but finding insufficient evidence that her contributions were substantially greater than others with minimum qualifications. The AAO sustained the appeal, concluding that the petitioner's publication record and strong letters of recommendation from experts in the field adequately established that her past achievements and future work would serve the national interest to a degree significantly greater than a minimally qualified U.S. worker.

Criteria Discussed

Substantial Intrinsic Merit National In Scope Serving National Interest To A Substantially Greater Degree Than U.S. Worker Past Record Justifying Projections Of Future Benefit

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Draft with AAO-aware legal structure

MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.

Start a Criteria-Based Draft →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.