sustained
EB-2 NIW
sustained EB-2 NIW Case: Medical Science
Decision Summary
The director initially denied the petition, acknowledging the petitioner's work in cancer genetics was of intrinsic merit and national scope, but finding the evidence of impact (such as citations and letters) was insufficient to prove the petitioner would benefit the national interest to a substantially greater degree than a qualified U.S. worker. The AAO disagreed with the director's assessment, sustained the appeal, and ultimately approved the petition.
Criteria Discussed
Substantial Intrinsic Merit National In Scope Serving National Interest To A Substantially Greater Degree Than A U.S. Worker
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.