EB-2 NIW Sustained — Nanotechnology (2005): established satisfaction of the third prong of the national
Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See how your CV maps to the criteria this decision turned on — free strategy preview.
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner successfully demonstrated satisfaction of the third prong of the national interest waiver test. While the director had already conceded the petitioner's work in nanotechnology was of substantial merit and national scope, the AAO found that the evidence, including letters from independent experts, showed a past history of significant achievements and influence on the field, justifying the conclusion that the petitioner would benefit the national interest to a greater degree than a minimally qualified U.S. worker.
See how a decision like this gets cited in an EB-2 NIW petition →Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Filing your own EB-2 NIW? See what made this petition succeed.
Upload your CV and see how your profile maps to the criteria the AAO sustained here — free strategy preview, no credit card.
Map Your CV to These Criteria →No credit card required.