sustained EB-2 NIW Case: Otolaryngology
Decision Summary
The Director initially denied the petition, finding the petitioner had not demonstrated sufficient impact on his field to meet the third prong of the national interest waiver analysis. The appeal was sustained because the petitioner provided substantial evidence of his influence, including publications, book chapters, peer-review work for prestigious journals, conference presentations, and letters from independent experts attesting to the significance and clinical application of his research.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.