sustained EB-2 NIW Case: Physics
Decision Summary
The appeal was initially denied because the petitioner failed to demonstrate he met the third prong of the NYSDOT national interest waiver framework, specifically lacking a nexus between his past influential research and his current work. Upon a motion to reopen, the petitioner submitted new evidence detailing his ongoing research, its application, and his future plans, which successfully established his influence and satisfied the criteria. Consequently, the AAO granted the motion and sustained the appeal.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Draft with AAO-aware legal structure
MeritDraft helps you turn research into a criteria-based petition draft with organized evidence, legal framing, and attorney-ready structure.
Start a Criteria-Based Draft →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.