remanded EB-2 Case: Software Consulting

U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
MATTER OF 0-T- LLC 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
DATE: APR. 14, 2017 
APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION 
PETITION: I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER 
The Petitioner, a software consulting and staffing business, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a 
programmer analyst. It seeks to classify the Beneficiary as a member of the professions holding an 
advanced degree under the second preference immigrant classification. See section 203(b )(2) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). This "EB-2" classification allows 
a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with an advanced degree for lawful permanent resident 
status. A bachelor's degree alone does not qualify as an "advanced degree," but a bachelor's degree 
plus five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience will suffice for EB-2 classification 
purposes. 
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition. The Director found, based on the 
issuance date of the Beneficiary's bachelor's degree diploma, that the Beneficiary could not show a 
minimum of five years of post-baccalaureate experience, as required to establish that he possesses 
the equivalent of an advanced degree. 
On appeal, the Petitioner contends that the Beneficiary does have the five years of post­
baccalaureate experience, which should be measured from when he received a provisional degree 
certificate demonstrating that his degree was complete and approved, not from the later date when 
the diploma itself was issued. 
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision. The case will be remanded to the 
Director for further consideration and the issuance of a new decision. 
I. LAW 
Employment-based immigration generally follows a three-step process. First, an employer must obtain 
an approved labor certification from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).
1 
See section 212(a)(5)(A)(i) 
ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(5)(A)(i). By approving the labor certification DOL certifies that there 
1 The date the labor certification is filed, in cases such as this one, is called the "priority date." A beneficiary must be 
eligible as of that date, and so In this case the Beneficiary must have had the requisite five years of experience by the 
date the labor certification was filed. 
.
Matter of 0-T- LLC 
are insufficient U.S. workers who are able, willing, qualified, and available for the offered position 
and that employing a foreign national in the position will not adversely affect the wages and working 
conditions of domestic workers similarly employed. Second, the employer may file an immigrant 
visa petition with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). See section 204 of the Act, 
8 U.S.C. § 1154. Third, if USCIS approves the petition, the foreign national may apply for an 
immigrant visa abroad or, if eligible, adjustment of status in the United States. See section 245 of 
the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255. 
II. ANALYSIS 
A. Post-Baccalaureate Experience 
For this advanced degree professional position, the labor certification must provide that the job requires 
an advanced degree or its equivalent. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(i). In pertinent part, Department of 
Homeland Security regulations define the term "advanced degree" as: "[A ]ny United States academic or 
professional degree or a foreign equivalent degree above that of baccalaureate. A United States 
baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of progressive 
experience in the specialty shall be considered the equivalent of a master's degree." 8 C.F.R. 
§ 204.5(k)(2) (emphasis added). To be eligible for this EB-2 classification solely on the basis of a 
foreign degree equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree, a beneficiary must also possess five years of 
qualifying post-baccalaureate experience. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3). 
The Beneficiary possesses a bachelor of engineering degree from 
m India. There is 
no question that the Beneficiary's degree qualifies him for EB-2 classification or that his experience 
qualifies as progressive experience. The issue in this proceeding is when the Beneficiary received his 
"degree" from the university. More specifically, we will explore whether the "degree" dates from when 
the Beneficiary actually received the formal diploma, or earlier when he completed all of the 
requirements for the degree and received what is commonly termed a provisional degree cert((icate 
indicating that his degree was approved. We conclude, based on the specific circumstances and 
evidence in this case, that the provisional degree certificate constitutes the official academic record of 
the Beneficiary's "degree" for purposes of dating the degree and calculating the five-year period of 
post-graduate experience. 
In this case, the Beneficiary's priority date (when the labor certification was filed) is May 27, 2015. 
issued a provisional degree certificate to the Beneficiary on July 16, 2006. However, the 
Beneficiary did not receive his formal diploma until February 14, 2009. Following the receipt of his 
provisional degree certificate, the Beneficiary was employed by from July 
24, 2006, to December 7, 2007, and with 
from December 10,2007, to December 21, 2012? 
2 The Beneficiary went to work for the Petitioner as a programmer analyst on December 24, 20 12, and continued to be 
employed as such through the priority date of May 27, 2015, and beyond. This employment is not qualifying experience 
2 
.
Matter of 0-T- LLC 
Regarding February 14, 2009, as the date of the Beneficiary's degree, the Director found that the 
Beneficiary did not have five years of qualifying experience at the time his employment with 
ended in December 2012. As calculated by the Director, the Beneficiary accrued 
just over three years and ten months of qualifying experience with between his 
diploma date of February 14, 2009, and the date his employment ended in December 2012. 
Therefore, the Beneficiary did not meet the minimum experience requirement of the labor 
certification and the EB-2 visa classification. 
On appeal, the Petitioner maintains that the Beneficiary did accrue the requisite five years of post­
degree experience if we recognize that his "degree" was conferred on the earlier date of his 
provisional degree certificate, which was July 16, 2006. The Beneficiary began working in a 
qualifying capacity eight days later, more than two and one-half years before he received his formal 
diploma. So the Beneficiary has the required five years of experience if measured from the date of 
his provisional degree certificate, but not if measured from the date of his diploma. 
The statute and regulations governing the EB-2 classification speak in terms of "degrees," not 
diplomas. So, from the outset, it is clear that we cannot limit our analysis to the date on which a 
university confers a formal diploma on its newest alumni. Applicable EB-2 regulations reflect this 
distinction. For these EB-2 "bachelor plus five" petitions, the "initial evidence" rule requires 
submission of an "official academic record" showing the beneficiary has a foreign equivalent 
"degree." 8 C.P.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(B). An "official academic record" is not limited to a formal 
diploma.3 In fact, in the very next provision - relating to EB-2 exceptional ability petitions -the 
initial evidence rule expressly distinguishes between degree and diploma: "[a]n official academic 
record showing that the alien has a degree, diploma, cert(ficate, or similar award from a college, 
university, .... " 8 C.P.R.§ 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A) (emphasis added).4 
Accordingly, we must coriduct a case-specific analysis to determine whether, at the time a 
provisional degree certificate is issued, the individual has completed all substantive requirements to 
earn the degree and the university has approved the degree. We must consider the individual nature 
of each university's or college's requirements for each program of study and each student's 
completion of those requirements. A petitioner will bear the burden to establish that a beneficiary's 
provisional degree certificate reflects that, at the time the certificate was issued, all of the substantive 
under the terms of the labor certification (specifically, box J.21 of the ETA Form 9089). , 
3 See also USCIS Adjudicator's Field Manual, Appendix 22-1, Memorandum from Michael D, Cronin, Acting Associate 
Commissioner, USCIS HQ 70/6.2, Educational and Experience Requirementsj(Jr Employment-Based Second Preference 
(EB-2) Immigrants (March 20, 2000), https://uscis.gov/ilink/docYiew/ AFM/HTMLI AFM/0-0-0-I/0-0-0-26573/0-0-0-
311 07.html (last visited Mac 15, 20 17), ("Whether the alien beneficiary possesses the advanced degree should be 
demonstrated by evidence in the form of a transcript fi'om the institution that granted the advanced degree. An 
adjudicator must similarly consider the baccalaureate transcript . , .. ") (emphasis added). 
4 While this provision helps clarifY that the terms degree and diploma are not equivalent, we note generally that, in 
contrast to the advanced degree category, the EB-2 exceptional ability category is not grounded entirely in an academic 
award and thus its initial evidence rule is more expansive than that of the advanced degree category, 
3 
.
Matter of 0-T- LLC 
requirements for the degree were met and the degree was m fact approved by the responsible 
university body.5 
In this case, the record demonstrates that the provisional degree certificate in July 2006 was a 
certification that the Beneficiary had completed all substantive requirements and the university had 
in fact approved the degree. The record contains the following university documents 
contemporaneous with the relevant events: (l) copies ofthe Beneficiary's statements of marks from 
for all eight semesters of his degree program from 2002 to 2006, showing that he passed all 
of the examinations; (2) a copy of the Beneficiary's provisional degree certificate issued by 
on July 16, 2006, which states that the Beneficiary "has completed all the requirements and has 
become eligible for award of the BE; Electrical & Electronics Engg. in June 2006;" and (3) a copy of 
the Beneficiary's diploma that issued on February 14, 2009. In addition, the Petitioner 
submitted a March 2016 letter from registrar stating that the Beneficiary's "earned a 
Bachelor's. degree in Electrical & Electronics in June 2006 after completing all the courses 
requirements (sic) .... however his final degree was issued in February of 2009. Degree issue date 
should not be considered as degree completion date. In [the Beneficiary's] case degree completion 
date is June 2006." 
Finally, we tum to information publicly available from the American Association of Collegiate 
Registrars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO) Electronic Database for Global Education 
(EDGE),6 and note that it accords with the Petitioner's claim and evidence. On the matter of 
provisional degree certificates issued by Indian universities, AACRAO EDGE states: 
The Provisional Degree Certificate is evidence of completion of all requirements for 
the degree in question, the name of the degree and the date upon which it was 
approved by the responsible university governing body, and is comparable to an 
official US academic transcript with a degree statement cetiifying completion of all 
requirements for the degree, the name of the degree and the date upon which it was 
approved by the academic senate at universities in the United States. 7 
EDGE additionally notes that some students never receive their "final Degree Certificate," but 
instead rely on the provisional degree certificate as evidence of degree completion. /d. 
5 Along with any other proffered evidence, petitioners must also submit. a copy of a beneficiary's statement of marks or 
transcript to demonstrate years of study, and coursework completed, along with a copy of the provisional certificate. See 
8 C.F.R § 204.5(k)(3) (requiring the submission of an official academic record as evidence of a beneficiary's possession 
of an advanced degree or equivalent of an advanced degree). 
6 AACRAO is "a nonprofit, voluntary, professional association of more than I I ,000 higher education professionals who 
represent approximately 2,600 institutions in over 40 countries." http://www4.aacrao.org/centennial/about.htm (last 
visited Mar. 15, 20 17). According to its registration page, EDGE is "a web-based resource for the evaluation of foreign 
educational credentials." http://edge.aacrao.org/info.php (last visited Mar. 15, 20 17). 
7 See India: Provisional Degree Certificate, AACRAO, http://edge.aacrao.org/country/credential/provisional-degree­
certificate (last visited Mar. 15, 20 17). 
4 
Matter of 0- T- LLC 
The provisional degree certificate, together with the statements of marks, demonstrates that the 
Beneficiary completed all the substantive requirements and that the university approved his degree. 
We find that the issuance of the provisional degree certificate conferred on the Beneficiary the 
foreign equivalent of a bachelor's degree. Applying the date of the provisional degree certificate, we 
also find that the Beneficiary gained at least five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience. 
Accordingly, the Petitioner has established that the Beneficiary meets the minimum education and 
experience requirements of the labor certification and of EB-2 classification. 
B. Ability to Pay 
Aside from establishing that the Beneficiary is eligible for classification as an advanced degree 
professional and qualifies for the job offered under the terms of the labor certification, the Petitioner 
must also establish its continuing ability to pay the Beneficiary the proffered wage of $111,426 from 
the priority date of the petition until the date the Beneficiary acquires lawful permanent residence. 
8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). Evidence of ability to pay must include copies of annual reports, federal 
income tax returns, or audited financial statements. !d. In addition to the Beneficiary in this case, 
the Petitioner must also establish its ability to pay the proffered wages of all the other beneficiaries 
of its I-140 immigrant petitions from the priority date ofthe instant petition onward. See 8 C.F.R. 
§ 204.5(g)(2); see also Matter ofGreat Wall, 16 I&N Dec. 142, 144 (Acting Reg'l Comm'r 1977). 
In this case, the record does not contain evidence of the Petitioner's ability to pay the proffered wage 
in the year ofthe priority date, 2015. As such, the petition cannot be approved. 
III. CONCLUSION 
The Petitioner has established that the Beneficiary meets the requirements of the labor certification and 
is eligible for EB-2 classification; however, the recor<;l does not demonstrate the Petitioner's ability to 
pay the Beneficiary the proffered wage from the priority date onward. Accordingly, we will remand 
this case to the Director for consideration of the ability to pay issue, and any other issue(s) that may be 
deemed pertinent. 
ORDER: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for further 
proceedings consistent with the foregoing opinion and for the entry of a new decision. 
Cite as Matter ofO-T- LLC, ID# 11976 (AAO Apr. 14, 2017) 
5